Monday, December 06, 2004

 

Once again, Tom Friedman is preaching to...well, whatever it is, it's not the choir

Considering who owns George W. Bush - hint: it rhymes with "boil frumpanies" - there is, to be precise, less than zero percent chance of this happening.
Fly Me to the Moon

By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

Of all the irresponsible aspects of the 2005 budget bill that the Republican-led Congress just passed, nothing could be more irresponsible than the fact that funding for the National Science Foundation was cut by nearly 2 percent, or $105 million. Think about this. We are facing a mounting crisis in science and engineering education. The generation of scientists, engineers and mathematicians who were spurred to get advanced degrees by the 1957 Soviet launch of Sputnik and the challenge by President John Kennedy to put a man on the moon is slowly retiring.

But because of the steady erosion of science, math and engineering education in U.S. high schools, our cold war generation of American scientists is not being fully replenished. We traditionally filled the gap with Indian, Chinese and other immigrant brainpower. But post-9/11, many of these foreign engineers are not coming here anymore, and, because the world is now flat and wired, many others can stay home and innovate without having to emigrate.

If we don't do something soon and dramatic to reverse this "erosion," Shirley Ann Jackson, the president of Rensselaer Polytechnic and president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, told me, we are not going to have the scientific foundation to sustain our high standard of living in 15 or 20 years.

Instead of doubling the N.S.F. budget - to support more science education and research at every level - this Congress decided to cut it! Could anything be more idiotic?

If President Bush is looking for a legacy, I have just the one for him - a national science project that would be our generation's moon shot: a crash science initiative for alternative energy and conservation to make America energy-independent in 10 years. Imagine if every American kid, in every school, were galvanized around such a vision. Ah, you say, nice idea, Friedman, but what does it have to do with your subject - foreign policy?

Everything! You give me an America that is energy-independent and I will give you sharply reduced oil revenues for the worst governments in the world. I will give you political reform from Moscow to Riyadh to Tehran. Yes, deprive these regimes of the huge oil windfalls on which they depend and you will force them to reform by having to tap their people instead of oil wells. These regimes won't change when we tell them they should. They will change only when they tell themselves they must.

If President Bush made energy independence his moon shot, he would dry up revenue for terrorism; force Iran, Russia, Venezuela and Saudi Arabia to take the path of reform - which they will never do with $45-a-barrel oil - strengthen the dollar; and improve his own standing in Europe, by doing something huge to reduce global warming. He would also create a magnet to inspire young people to contribute to the war on terrorism and America's future by becoming scientists, engineers and mathematicians. "This is not just a win-win," said the Johns Hopkins foreign policy expert Michael Mandelbaum. "This is a win-win-win-win-win."

Sure, it would require some sacrifice. But remember J.F.K.'s words when he summoned us to go to the moon on Sept. 12, 1962: "We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win."

Summoning all our energies and skills to produce a 21st-century fuel is George W. Bush's opportunity to be both Nixon to China and J.F.K. to the moon - in one move.
Okay, yes, it's the job of a pundit to offer unsolicited advice that he knows will never be taken. (If there was any chance he would be listened to, he'd be inside the tent pissing in, rather than outside the tent pissing against the tent.) But there should be at least some sense of reality to the whole enterprise, otherwise it's just a smug git showing off for his easily impressed (he hopes) readership.

If he has even a shred of sanity, Tom Friedman must know that George W. Bush could not care less about genuine energy independence, let alone serious regime change in the Middle East. To the extent that he wants to increase American power, that is as long as it does not come at the expense of the power of his oil company paymasters. Besides that, there is no political payoff for asking the American people to climb down from their giant SUVs. Kerry talked about energy independence - and Bush ridiculed Kerry for doing so. His idea of energy independence is tearing up ANWR.

Mr. Friedman, please stop trying to get through to these people. If you seriously want your ideas listened to seriously, volunteer for the Democrats. It's a long shot, but it's the only shot you have.
Comments:
Howdy!

I am out spreading the word
to all true supporters of evangelical bible

I believe that readers of this blog
would be fascinated to read about
the great new book at

evangelical bible
 
Post a Comment

<< Home
Comments: "
Howdy!

I am out spreading the word
to all true supporters of evangelical bible

I believe that readers of this blog
would be fascinated to read about
the great new book at

evangelical bible
 
" Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?